The pros and cons of evidence-based medicine.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Evidence-based medicine has evolved with at least three distinct components: the core evidence, the systematic methods of reviewing and synthesising the evidence, and the use and application of the evidence in practice. This paper considers the tensions that exist because of different perceptions about the value, quality and interpretation of clinical and research evidence. The current challenges lie in developing better means of integrating different types of evidence from a range of sources to improve decisions about individual patients, and embedding guidelines in personal and stimulating clinical practice. Introduction In a debate “Evidence Based Medicine: Saviour or Pariah” at the 9 International Forum on Low Back Pain Research in Primary Care, evidence based medicine (EBM) made it as saviour but it was close. Championed by Sackett in the 1990’s (1), EBM has received both support and criticism from researchers, clinicians and policy makers. In this paper, we consider some common arguments for and against EBM. What exactly is EBM? ”Evidence based medicine” conveys the idea that up-to-date evidence can be used and applied consistently in clinical practice, in combination with the clinician’s individual expertise and the patient’s own preferences and expectations, to achieve the best possible outcomes. Evidence is provided by original research and by systematic reviews that find, select, judge, and integrate the evidence on any topic. This provides the basis for treatment guidelines, which incorporate expert interpretation of available evidence whilst taking additional arguments into account, such as treatment availability, costs and ethical aspects. Hence, we move from evidence to practice. Debate Experienceor evidence-based medicine?
منابع مشابه
Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملPros and Cons of Dancing in the Dark: Enhancing EFL learners' oral proficiency in an unplugged learning community
Recent thrust of research has focused on non-conventional classrooms for teaching to EFL learners. Amongst the newly developed models, Unplugged Classroom Model (UCM) is the most debated one as textbooks are aside and the syllabus is based on conversation-driven activities. This study sought to determine the pros and cons of unplugged teaching for enhancing EFL learners' oral proficiency. From ...
متن کاملCompensatory Efforts; A Critique of the Pros and Cons
Compensatory efforts, positive discrimination or reverse discrimination are the terms which nowadays are used in applied ethics for a set of efforts and privileges which are scheduled for compensation of the historical oppressions and discriminations imposed upon some groups and classes in the society. The mentioned oppressions and discriminations may be applied deliberately or inadvertently or...
متن کاملPredictors of Stages of Change in Fruit/Vegetable Consumption based on Trans-Theoretical Model: A Population-based Study
Background and Objectives: Low Fruit/Vegetable (FV) diet seems to be a global public health problem. The trans-theoretical stages of change model have long been considered a useful interventional approach in lifestyle modification programs. The aim of this study was to find the most important intermediating factors of FV consumption in Mashhad, Iran. Materials and Methods...
متن کاملIdentifying Subgroups among Hardcore Smokers: a Latent Profile Approach
INTRODUCTION Hardcore smokers are smokers who have little to no intention to quit. Previous research suggests that there are distinct subgroups among hardcore smokers and that these subgroups vary in the perceived pros and cons of smoking and quitting. Identifying these subgroups could help to develop individualized messages for the group of hardcore smokers. In this study we therefore used the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Spine
دوره 36 17 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011